Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2019
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy