Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W4100

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy