Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy