Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
8 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
G98S
-
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
UMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy