Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-300-A2
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy