Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy