Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy