Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-300-B1
R500
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy