Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
R500
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy