Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
R500
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy