Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Released 11 months late

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
R500
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
2.1
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy