Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +1455%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy