Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +5170%
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
960
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy