Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W2100

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 26W)
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
-
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
26W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy