Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 40W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.000GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 +21%
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GT218
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy