Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +55587%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3840
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 21
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy