Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 +1459%
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
5
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Oland
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy