Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB +3318%
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU117
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy