Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +13459%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA107
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy