ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+255275%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
153 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
