Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM +1309%
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
40
Shading Units
144
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GF106
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy