Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.68GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2 +3025%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
R700
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy