Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +7587%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Baffin
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy