Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +26971%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
205W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy