ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
+4940%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Tobago
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
