Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +4940%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tobago
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy