Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2200MHz vs 905MHz)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile +467%
3.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Trinity
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy