Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon R8 M535DX

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon R8 M535DX

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R8 M535DX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (905MHz vs 891MHz)
64 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +21%
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon R8 M535DX
0.57 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2017
Trinity
Generation
Gem System Hybrid
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
891 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
5
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.128 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
570.2 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
570.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.64 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Meso
A300
GPU Variant
Meso PRO (216-0864032)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy