Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 405 Mobile 16EU

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 405 Mobile 16EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 405 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (905MHz vs 740MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 405 Mobile 16EU 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +354%
0.695 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 405
0.153 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
740 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
153.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
38.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
6W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Braswell GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.3
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy