Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 610M

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 610M

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 610M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2200MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +23%
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon 610M
0.563 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Trinity
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
2
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1126 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
563.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Dragon Range
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
264 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy