Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP

AMD FirePro A300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3200 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +1637%
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3200 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2008
Trinity
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
RS780
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
-
32 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy