Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP

AMD FirePro A300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
344 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (9W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +2216%
0.695 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
0.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2010
Trinity
Generation
Radeon IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.520 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.520 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.40 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
9W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
RS880
A300
GPU Variant
RS880M
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
-
32 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy