Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D700 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro D700 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro D700 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (263.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D700
3.482 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +244%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1370 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
263.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD107
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy