Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M365X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M365X +71%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
10
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Chelsea
GPU Name
Tropo
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy