Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +5854%
32.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net