Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM +21%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Oct 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
8
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Lexa
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy