AMD FirePro M8900 vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
+35%
1.766 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
DG2-128
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
