Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +584%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
AD107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy