Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M5725

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +202%
1.306 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
M96
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
M96 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy