Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +2364%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
960
Shading Units
24
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GT216
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy