Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +570%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
80
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy