Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 +785%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy