Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +2185%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy