Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
10160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +65175%
52.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
80
Shading Units
10240
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy