Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +3816%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Remote
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy