Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +22175%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Remote
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy