Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +1916%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Remote
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
1
Compute Units
12
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy