Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +14900%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Remote
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
80
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy