Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +28700%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Remote
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
80
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy