Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +5220%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3470
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
30W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Orthrus
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy